Skip to content

Nature summarizes iPS cell challenges

I wrote last week about disturbing results from scientists who found that iPS cells (also known as induced pluripotent stem cells) are attacked and rejected by the immune system of mice - even when the cells were genetically identical to the recipient animals. The finding illustrated how once-promising iPS cells - beloved among some political groups because they can be generated directly from a patient without destroying a human embryo - could face a rockier path to the clinic than most people first envisioned.

Reporter Erika Check Hayden outlines these and other challenges in today's Nature News:

No one doubts that iPS cells still have enormous potential, but the field's initial optimism has cooled. "Right now, we are a long way from being sophisticated enough to take advantage of these cells' potential," says neuroscientist Arnold Kriegstein of the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF). "Things are still at a very early stage."

Erika goes on to discuss five major challenges, gathering input from many leading researchers, including our own Renee Reijo Pera, PhD. Erika is a fantastic reporter and it's always a treat to read her thoughtful articles. You can also follow her on Twitter at @Erika_Check. I, for one, am going to bookmark the article for future re-reading and reference. There's a lot to think about there.

Previously: Setback for induced pluripotent stem cells

Popular posts

Category:
Genetics
Sex biology redefined: Genes don’t indicate binary sexes

The scenario many of us learned in school is that two X chromosomes make someone female, and an X and a Y chromosome make someone male. These are simplistic ways of thinking about what is scientifically very complex.
Category:
Nutrition
Intermittent fasting: Fad or science-based diet?

Are the health-benefit claims from intermittent fasting backed up by scientific evidence? John Trepanowski, postdoctoral research fellow at the Stanford Prevention Research Center,weighs in.