Skip to content

When it comes to nutritional value, debating "organic" vs. "conventionally grown" may be beyond the point

Erin Prosser at Scientific American Blogs writes that consumers who debate the nutritional values of organic versus conventionally grown fruits and vegetables may be missing the point:

So for now, I say whether you choose the organic bag of apples or the conventionally grown ones really doesn’t make a big difference. As long as you’re choosing any bag of apples over a bag of Doritos, you’re on the right track.

This rings especially true for those who might have access to corner stores and supermarkets that vend conventionally grown produce, but not organic products.

Previously: Organic vs. natural: Tips for parents who want to go green, "Natural" or not, chicken nuggets are high in fat, sodium and People equate "organic" with "healthy," risking poor food choices
Photo by karimian

Popular posts

Category:
Genetics
Sex biology redefined: Genes don’t indicate binary sexes

The scenario many of us learned in school is that two X chromosomes make someone female, and an X and a Y chromosome make someone male. These are simplistic ways of thinking about what is scientifically very complex.
Category:
Nutrition
Intermittent fasting: Fad or science-based diet?

Are the health-benefit claims from intermittent fasting backed up by scientific evidence? John Trepanowski, postdoctoral research fellow at the Stanford Prevention Research Center,weighs in.