Skip to content

U.S. Appeals Court rules against health-care law

The U.S. Appeals Court for the 11th Circuit has just ruled (.pdf) that a key provision of the Obama Administration's health-care law requiring Americans to buy health-care insurance was unconstitutional. Reuters reports the court:

. . .found that Congress exceeded its authority by requiring Americans to buy coverage, but also ruled that the rest of the wide-ranging law could remain in effect.

The legality of the so-called individual mandate, a cornerstone of the 2010 healthcare law, is widely expected to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. The Obama administration has defended the provision as constitutional.

Previously: Stanford legal expert reacts to health-law ruling and Obama health-care law ruled unconstitutional

Popular posts

Sex biology redefined: Genes don’t indicate binary sexes

The scenario many of us learned in school is that two X chromosomes make someone female, and an X and a Y chromosome make someone male. These are simplistic ways of thinking about what is scientifically very complex.
Intermittent fasting: Fad or science-based diet?

Are the health-benefit claims from intermittent fasting backed up by scientific evidence? John Trepanowski, postdoctoral research fellow at the Stanford Prevention Research Center,weighs in.