Skip to content

Ask Stanford Med: Hank Greely taking questions on Supreme Court review of health-care law

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard the opening arguments in a historic three-day session that could decide the fate of the Affordable Care Act. Stanford law professor Hank Greely, JD, summarized the day's proceedings and offered his perspective in a previous Scope entry.

Over the next two days, Greely will continue to follow the oral arguments and comment briefly on the issues here on Scope. Additionally, he will take questions on the debate via Twitter as part of our Ask Stanford Med series. Questions can be submitted by either sending a tweet that includes the hashtag #AskSUMed or posting your question in the comments section below.

In submitting questions, please abide by the following ground rules:

  • Stay on topic
  • Be respectful to the person answering your questions
  • Be respectful to one another in submitting questions
  • Do not monopolize the conversation or post the same question repeatedly
  • Kindly ignore disrespectful or off topic comments
  • Know that Twitter handles and/or names may be used in the responses

Greely will answer a selection of your questions at the end of each day and post his responses in a Q&A on Scope.

Previously: The Supreme Court on health reform: day one, Health reform opponents lose in another appellate court, Thoughts on the Eleventh Circuit health-care law ruling and U.S. Appeals Court rules against health-care law
Photo by dbking

Popular posts

Sex biology redefined: Genes don’t indicate binary sexes

The scenario many of us learned in school is that two X chromosomes make someone female, and an X and a Y chromosome make someone male. These are simplistic ways of thinking about what is scientifically very complex.
Intermittent fasting: Fad or science-based diet?

Are the health-benefit claims from intermittent fasting backed up by scientific evidence? John Trepanowski, postdoctoral research fellow at the Stanford Prevention Research Center,weighs in.