Skip to content

The 10 biggest pitfalls in scientific presentations and how to avoid them

14037224149_65205456a9_zOne of the most valuable things I got out of graduate school was this bit of career advice: "There's no shortage of scientists. What we're lacking — and what we need — are people who can actually explain this stuff and do it well."

At first, I thought this meant we need more science writers. But really, the advice is intended for everyone. We all need to do a better job of communicating our work — it could be the key to a job, a valuable collaboration or more money and resources for your work.

So how can you communicate better? One way is to watch out for the "10 biggest pitfalls" as laid out by David Rubenson, the associate director of administration and strategic planning at Stanford's Cancer Institute. In a recent post on the Naturejobs blog, he cites common traps such as not rehearsing your presentation and rushing through your slides.

And the number one mistake?

Thinking a collection of slides is enough

Your 50 slides may allow you to talk for 50 minutes, but that doesn’t mean you have anything to say. Always have an overarching scientific question and narrative. Slides fragment even the most coherent story, so make sure each slide supports the narrative.

Previously: Making science accessible to scientistsFree, online Stanford course on science writing opens this week and A call to fix the "crisis of communication" in science
Photo by Stanford University

Popular posts

Category:
Biomedical research
Stanford immunologist pushes field to shift its research focus from mice to humans

Much of what we know about the immune system comes from experiments conducted on mice.  But lab mice are not little human beings. The two species are separated by both physiology and  lifestyles. Stanford immunologist Mark Davis is calling on his colleagues to shift their research focus to people.