Published by
Stanford Medicine

Category

In the News

Humor, In the News, Medical Education, Medicine and Literature, Medicine and Society, Patient Care

Graphic medicine takes flight

Empathy-Ian-Williams-510x438A recent blog post on Somatosphere sparked my interest in the role that comics can play in the study and delivery of health care, an emerging field called “graphic medicine.” The term was coined by UK-based Ian Williams, MD, who is an artist and independent humanities scholar as well as a physician. He recently launched a website of the same name.

The post introduces a few new books that just came out on the subject: Graphic Medicine Manifesto, a collaborative work by six health-care professionals and humanities scholars, and Ian Williams’ The Bad Doctor. It also describes how comics can open us up to new ways of seeing in ways that text alone cannot:

Comics allow us to ask how we can “orient” ourselves… toward the potentiality of images and away from the systematizing effects of text alone… [Comics use] images and imagistic thinking as a way to see a different mode of existence.

Since it’s an anthropology blog, it suggests that a “graphic medical anthropology” would be a great way to accomplish the anthropologist’s goal of “seeing structure, complexity, nuance, emergence, and multiplicity simultaneously.” We anthropologists often try to achieve this goal with complicated metaphors and theories, but perhaps the old adage about a picture being worth a thousand words holds true in this case.

The post notes that drawings can provide an experience of self-reflection for the artist, and can inspire readers to readily and easily respond with their own experience, making the work more of a dialog. They can introduce “theoretical orientations” in ways that are more accessible, and can expose power relations in ordinary lived experience. Ordinary lived experience is particularly well conveyed by comics; they showcase the mundane and make it meaningful. They can take those “ordinary, chronic and cruddy moments” and convey what it’s like to be part of our society.

Previously: Cancer Ninja fights patient misinformation, one cartoon at a time, Using graphic art to understand the emotional aspects of disease, A comic look at 12 medical specialties, Economist to explain health reform through graphic novel, and Webcomic xkcd gets medical
Illustration by Ian Williams, “Autography as Auto-Therapy: Psychic Pain and the Graphic Memoir.” Journal of Medical Humanities 2011, reposted from Somatosphere

Health Policy, In the News, Medicine and Society, Pediatrics, Stanford News

Stanford researchers analyze California’s new vaccine law

Stanford researchers analyze California's new vaccine law

CA vaccine photoWhat do California, West Virginia and Mississippi have in common? Stumped?

Thanks to a recent law signed by California Gov. Jerry Brown, these three states now have strict vaccine policies that require children to be vaccinated before entering school, unless they have a medical exemption. The new requirements eliminate religious and philosophical exemptions.

Stanford’s Michelle Mello, JD, PhD, and David Studdert, LLB, ScD, (along with co-author Wendy Parmet, JD) heralded the change in a New England Journal of Medicine commentary published this week. From a Stanford News release:

“The move represents a stunning victory for public health that affects not only California schoolchildren, but the prospects for strengthening vaccination requirements nationwide,” they wrote.

The new laws come in the wake of a measles outbreak that started at Disneyland last year. It fueled a nationwide debate about the merits of vaccines, and of the large number of children unvaccinated due to parental objections.

The new California law requires all children enrolled in private and public schools and day-care facilities to be vaccinated against measles, whooping cough and several other diseases.

Yet the law is sure to face challenges, particularly from opponents who say it violates their religious rights. In addition, a lack of enforcement may weaken the law’s ability to ensure widespread protection.

Nonetheless, California’s new law is worth celebrating, they say:

“Although California politics may be distinctive, its experience with SB277 teaches us that even strong opposition can be overcome with the right combination of astute public education, political strategy and legislative fortitude,” they wrote. “Fewer vaccination exemptions and vaccine-preventable illnesses would be accomplishments that other states would find difficult to ignore.”

Previously: A discussion of vaccines, “the single most life-saving innovation ever in the history of medicine”, Science Friday-style podcast explains work toward a universal flu vaccine and Side effects of childhood vaccines are extremely rare, new study finds
Image by Niyazz

Cardiovascular Medicine, Chronic Disease, In the News, Research, Stanford News, Transplants

Are donor hearts getting wasted?

Are donor hearts getting wasted?

heart choiceI wrote a press release recently on a study that showed a high percentage of donated hearts were not being used, raising concerns that some were getting wasted when they could be used to save lives. This made me curious about the process of just how a donor heart, which ideally has about a two-hour window before it gets transplanted to a patient with heart failure, gets matched.

The result is a Stanford Medicine magazine story titled “Heart Choices” that describes this process, the tough decisions that family members make when a loved one donates a heart, and the excruciating waiting that patients in need of a new heart go through.

Most importantly the article asks the question: Should more “high-risk” donor hearts be used? An estimated 20,000 people across the country are waiting for new hearts, and only a few thousand transplants happen on average per year. My story explains the dilemma:

The general assumption is that there simply are not enough donor hearts available to meet a growing demand. But new research is questioning that assumption. Some researchers and surgeons claim that thousands of donor hearts that could be used are turned away each year. The hearts are considered marginal because they come from older, sicker or riskier donors, but many argue they are safe for transplant, and could be saving lives.

“As patients wait longer, they often get sicker, and we often lose patients,” says Stanford cardiologist Kiran Khush, MD, whose research reports that 65 percent of available heart donations are discarded because of stringent acceptance criteria. Yet the criteria have not been critically evaluated, she says. “Increasing the supply of donor hearts is, of course, a great concern of mine.”

Continue Reading »

In the News, Pediatrics, Public Health, Stanford News, Technology

Water-conscious hospital will debut in 2017 with expansion of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital

Water-conscious hospital will debut in 2017 with expansion of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital

hospital-expansion-exterior-stanford-childrensPlaces where people live and work tend to use a lot of water, and hospitals are no exception. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s 2012 report on water use in public buildings, hospitals rank third in water use just behind senior care facilities and hotels.

Now, the Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford is working to buck this trend with a new expansion that will use the latest water and energy-saving techniques and tools. This 521,000 square foot addition, which will open in 2017, is predicted to use about 38 percent less water than a comparable hospital.

This sustainable approach to building design began long before the current drought situation in California made water conservation a top priority. “In 2008, when we started planning, we knew there was not enough rainfall to sustain even the most efficient hospital’s needs,” said Robin Guenther, lead designer of the expansion project, in a recent post on the Healthier, Happy Lives blog.

In the piece, Guenther and her team discuss some of the expansion’s energy saving features, including shade structures that reduce the building’s heat gain from the sun and moving the hospital’s data center to the roof where it can be cooled by a wind-powered ventilation system instead of by air conditioning. According to Guenther, these modifications will make the building’s thermal energy consumption about 60 percent less than the average hospital in Northern California.

“Sustainability is a guiding principle in everything we do,” Christopher G. Dawes, president and chief executive officer of the hospital, commented. “Everyone on our team shares in this commitment. It’s part of being a good neighbor and a member of the larger community, and ensuring we’re doing the best thing possible when it comes to preserving all of our environmental resources.”

Previously: Green roofs are not just good for the environment, they boost productivity, study shows and From the Stanford Medicine archives: A Q&A with actor Matt Damon on water and health
Image courtesy of Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford

Autoimmune Disease, In the News, Mental Health, Pediatrics, Research, Stanford News

Stanford doctors unraveling mysterious childhood psychiatric disease

Stanford doctors unraveling mysterious childhood psychiatric disease

BrainModel2A story in Sunday’s Wall Street Journal highlights Stanford’s leadership in treating a mystifying disease in which a child suddenly develops intense psychiatric problems, often after an infection. The disease, called pediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome, can be terribly disabling, altering kids’ personalities, interfering with their school work and making it hard for families to function.

As the story (subscription required) explains, some physicians question whether PANS is actually a separate disease from the psychiatric diagnoses it resembles, which include obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa. But doctors at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford suspect something else is truly going on, likely an autoimmune attack on the brain. The team, led by Jennifer Frankovich, MD, and Kiki Chang, MD, is working to learn more about the disease:

In an effort to establish the science of PANS, the Stanford clinic is collecting extensive data on the patients. Doctors try to piece together what is driving symptoms from pediatric records, parent reports, even teacher interviews. They are analyzing DNA samples from each patient and looking for clues in their immune systems. If they find strep, they bank the strain for further research. “It is easier to study something that is established,” Dr. Frankovich said. “To build something new is really hard.”

The team’s insights from 47 of their patients were published earlier this year in a special PANS-focused issue of the Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology, and the researchers are currently working to expand the capacity of their PANS clinic, the first of its kind in the country. More information about PANS and its effect on children and families is also available in a Stanford Medicine magazine story I wrote last year about Frankovich and Chang’s work.

Previously: What happens when the immune system attacks the brain? Stanford doctors investigate and My descent into madness — a conversation with author Susannah Cahalan
Photo by GreenFlames09

Health Policy, In the News, Medicine and Society

Medicare to pay for end-of-life conversations with patients

Medicare to pay for end-of-life conversations with patients

800px-Doctor_and_couple_talking_(1)Remember “death panels?” In the summer of 2009, in the midst of the debate about the Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, a small item in the legislation allowing Medicare to reimburse physicians for end-of-life conversations with patients unleashed a tsunami of criticism. Opponents charged that so-called “death panels” – anonymous Washington bureaucrats – would be making decisions about rationing health care and ultimately deciding who would live and who would die. As foolish as that charge was, the Obama administration choose not to fight the opposition and the payment proposal was dropped.

Now, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has announced a new policy. Beginning January 1, 2016, the government will reimburse voluntary end-of-life conversations that Medicare physicians have with their patients.

We asked Stanford’s VJ Periyakoil, MD, a nationally recognized leader in palliative care, for comment, and she said, “Medicare’s proposal to reimburse doctors to have a conversation with the patient about their values and preferences for care is a quantum leap forward towards the lofty goal of improving quality of care for all Americans at the end-of-life.” But she emphasized that this is just one part of the solution:

Advance care planning is not an event but a process. The key is having conversations in plural, over time as patients’ goals of care change as their illness progresses.

Early in the illness, most patients prefer to have a trial of high-intensity treatments including life support, and this is a very reasonable thing to do. However, there is a tipping point in the illness trajectory where we go from prolonging life with quality to prolonging the dying process. Beyond this tipping point, most patients, if given a choice, prefer to die gently and naturally at home minimizing the burden to their loved ones. But in order for this to happen, we need doctors who are well trained and highly skilled at conducting end-of-life conversations with their patients. We need to ensure that patients and their proxy decision makers are well supported to make end of life decisions. Finally, it takes significant support of both the patient and caregiver by a skilled team of clinicians to ensure a gentle and peaceful death at home.

Unless we have all these components in place, we can’t expect to see major and sustained improvements in end-of-life care.

Previously: “Everybody dies – just discuss it and agree on what you want”In honor of National Healthcare Decisions Day: A reminder for patients to address end-of-life issuesA call to “improve quality and honor individual preferences at the end of life”Study: Doctors would choose less aggressive end-of-life care for themselves and On a mission to transform end-of-life care
Photo by National Cancer Institute

In the News, Neuroscience, Research

A year-long trip: One patient’s drug use linked to Alice in Wonderland syndrome

A year-long trip: One patient's drug use linked to Alice in Wonderland syndrome

8303093547_968a17bc4f_zA mind-bending condition long known for its associations with migraines may have another cause: acid use. Sufferers of Alice in Wonderland syndrome, a neurological disorder named in 1955, experience distortions of proportions: The world does not appear as it should be. Instead, it is too small, too close, too big or too far, just as was the case for the main character of the classic novel after eating a very small cake that read “EAT ME:”

“Good-bye feet!” said Alice, for when she looked down at her feet, they seemed to be almost out of sight, they were getting so far off. “Oh my poor little feet, I wonder who will put on your shoes and stockings for you now, dears? I’m sure I shan’t be able.”

For decades, this rare syndrome has been linked to migraines, but a new case report in the Israel Journal of Psychiatry shows that for one patient, it was brought on by LSD use — with his symptoms continuing for a year after the drug use has stopped.

Although researchers aren’t sure what caused the patient to experience the ongoing symptoms, the syndrome is generally caused by a hypersensitivity of the brain. Stanford neurologist Sheena Aurora, MD, explains in a LiveScience article:

This hypersensitivity typically starts in the occipital lobe, the visual region at the back of the brain. However, it can spread to the parietal lobes… which discern sizes and shapes, Aurora said.

Scholars have speculated that Lewis Carroll experienced migraines, which might have inspired Alice’s atypical adventures.

Previously: Director of Stanford Headache Clinic answers your questions on migraines and headache disorders, Advice on managing migraines and More attention, funding needed for headache care
Image by new 1luminati

Aging, In the News, Public Health, Sleep

Nothing to snort over: Why snoring should be taken seriously

Nothing to snort over: Why snoring should be taken seriously

6258904896_ec4a6f155a_zIt’s the middle of the night—or maybe the middle of the day—and all seems well. Then, you hear it: a low, rumbling, animalistic sound. It could be a snort or a growl or even a snarl. But it’s not an animal at all. It’s a person who is snoring far too loudly for your liking, and the sound only seems to be getting worse.

It’s safe to say we all know someone who snores – or we may even do it ourselves. A Huffington Post article puts a spotlight on snoring and features Stanford’s Rafael Pelayo, MD, who explains why it occurs, why it becomes increasingly worse with age, and, most importantly, why it could signal a potentially serious health problem.

“Think of fire and a fire alarm,” Pelayo says. “The snoring is the alarm. If there’s a fire and the fire alarm goes off and I disconnect the alarm, it doesn’t mean I put out the fire. The fire could still be burning.”

Snoring could be a symptom of sleep apnea, a disorder in which a person’s breathing repeatedly stops and starts during sleep. Apnea is a legitimate medical issue that can be harmful if gone unchecked, and Pelayo encourages anyone who snores to get tested for it.

Alex Giacomini is an English literature major at UC Berkeley and a writing and social media intern in the medical school’s Office of Communication and Public Affairs.

Previously: New recommendation: Adults need at least 7 hours of sleep each night, Why untreated sleep apnea may cause more harm to your health than feeling fatigued and How insufficient sleep can lead to weight gain 
Photo by Marc Lewis

Behavioral Science, In the News, Medicine and Society, Pregnancy, Public Health

Walking on sunshine: How to celebrate summer safely

3648104672_7b22d78bf6_z

Normally, I spend the Fourth of July on the shores of a Wisconsin lake, getting eaten alive by mosquitos, burning to a bright shade of pink, lighting sparklers and eating potato salad that has sat in the sun for hours. Heaps of fun, but also plenty of opportunities to fall ill.

This year, I’ve been barred from that fun trip by my oh-so-practical doc, who thinks unnecessary travel isn’t the smartest option for someone who is eight-months pregnant. Instead, I’ll have to be satisfied with reading a Washington Post article, published earlier this week, about all the summer health hazards I’m avoiding by celebrating the holiday in my coastal California home.

First is athlete’s foot, a fungus that “lingers on warm, wet surfaces such as poolside pavement and the floors of locker rooms and public showers” that produces an oozing pus. Or its relative, a toenail fungus that leads to yellow, thickened nails. And I thought a big belly was a bit of bother.

There’s also coxsackie virus, known for causing hand, foot and mouth disease, which thrives in kids’ wading pools courtesy of the occasional leaky diaper. The virus usually causes blisters; in rare cases it can lead to heart failure, says Stanford pediatrics professor Bonnie Maldonado, MD. Note to self: Keep baby out of unchlorinated kiddie pools.

We’re just getting warmed up here. There’s the summertime regulars of food poisoning, heat exhaustion and heat stroke. So yeah, that potato salad, while still yummy, probably isn’t a good idea, nor is the all-afternoon exposure to 95-plus degrees.

Don’t forget swimmer’s ear, an infection of the ear canal that, according to otolaryngologist Richard Rosenfeld, MD, from New York can “really, really, really hurt and ruin a vacation.” And a walk in the woods can quickly yield a ravaging rash from poison ivy or oak.

Throw in insect-borne plagues like West Nile and Lyme disease and gee, I guess my front porch isn’t looking so bad after all.

Previously: As summer heats up, take steps to protect your skin, This summer’s Stanford Medicine magazine shows some skin and Stanford nutrition expert offers tips for a healthy and happy Fourth of July
Photo by Jordan Richmond

Genetics, In the News, Research, Science, Stanford News, Stem Cells, Technology

CRISPR marches forward: Stanford scientists optimize use in human blood cells

CRISPR marches forward: Stanford scientists optimize use in human blood cells

The CRISPR news just keeps coming. As we’ve described here before, CRISPR is a breakthrough way of editing the genome of many organisms, including humans — a kind of biological cut-and-paste function that is already transforming scientific and clinical research. However, there are still some significant scientific hurdles that exist when attempting to use the technique in cells directly isolated from human patients (these are called primary cells) rather than human cell lines grown for long periods of time in the laboratory setting.

Now pediatric stem cell biologist Matthew Porteus, MD, PhD, and postdoctoral scholars Ayal Hendel, PhD, and Rasmus Bak, PhD, have collaborated with researchers at Santa Clara-based Agilent Research Laboratories to show that chemically modifying the guide RNAs tasked with directing the site of genome snipping significantly enhances the efficiency of editing in human primary blood cells — an advance that brings therapies for human patients closer. The research was published yesterday in Nature Biotechnology.

As Porteus, who hopes to one day use the technique to help children with genetic blood diseases like sickle cell anemia, explained to me in an email:

We have now achieved the highest rates of editing in primary human blood cells. These frequencies are now high enough to compete with the other genome editing platforms for therapeutic editing in these cell types.

Porteus and Hendel previously developed a way to identify how frequently the CRISPR system does (or does not) modify the DNA where scientists tell it. Hendel characterizes the new research as something that will allow industrial-scale manufacturing of pharmaceutical-grade CRISPR reagents. As he told me:

Our research shows that scientists can now modify the CRISPR technology to improve its activity and specificity, as well as to open new doors for its use it for imaging, biochemistry, epigenetic, and gene activation or repression studies.

Rasmus agrees, saying, “Our findings will not only benefit researchers working with primary cells, but it will also accelerate the translation of CRISPR gene editing into new therapies for patients.”

Onward!

(Those of you wanting a thorough primer on CRISPR —how it works and what could be done with it — should check out Carl Zimmer’s comprehensive article in Quanta magazine. If you prefer to learn by listening (perhaps, as I sometimes do, while on the treadmill), I found this podcast from Radiolab light, but interesting.)

Previously: Policing the editor: Stanford scientists devise way to monitor CRISPR effectiveness and “It’s not just science fiction anymore”: Childx speakers talk stem cell and gene therapy

 

Stanford Medicine Resources: