on September 29th, 2015 No Comments
I wrote a news release last week about a study just published in Science Translational Medicine. The study, despite it having been conducted in mice, not humans, received a fair amount of coverage – by The Washington Post, Yahoo!, Fox News, NBC, CBS and Reuters, among other places – and deserved the attention it got. It demonstrated the efficacy of a small-molecule drug that can disable the nasty intestinal pathogen C. difficile without killing it – and, importantly, without decimating the “good” bacteria that populate our gut by the trillions.
That’s a big deal. If you want to see a lot of ugly weeds pop up, there’s no better way to go about it than letting your lawn go to hell.
C. difficile – responsible for more than 250,000 hospitalizations and 15,000 deaths per year in the United States and a $4 billion annual health-care tab in the U.S. alone – is typically treated by antibiotics, which have the unfortunate side effect of wiping out much of our intestinal microbe population. That loss of carpeting, ironically, lays the groundwork for a dangerous and all-too-common comeback of C. difficile infection.
A question worth asking about this study, conducted by what-makes-pathogens-tick expert Matt Bogyo, PhD, and a team of Stanford associates: Why should we think that what works in mice is going to work in people?
The only sure answer isn’t a torrent of language but a clinical trial of the drug, ebselen, in real, live people with C. difficile infections or at risk for them. (Bogyo has already started accumulating funding to initiate a trial along those lines.)
But there’s also reassurance to be drawn from the fact that ebselen isn’t an entirely exotic newcomer to the world of medical research. As I noted in my release:
Bogyo and his associates focused on … ebselen because, in addition to having a strong inhibitory effect, ebselen also has been tested in clinical trials for chemotherapy-related hearing loss and for stroke. Preclinical testing provided evidence that ebselen is safe and tolerable, and it has shown no significant adverse effects in ensuing clinical trials.