Skip to content

Is extreme distance running healthy or harmful?

Recent research has called into question the health benefits of regularly running for long periods of time, such as what's done by ultra-marathoners and serial marathon runners, and a San Francisco Chronicle story takes a closer look at the evidence.

In the piece, writer Erin Allday highlights two studies released earlier this year suggesting potential negative health effects from long-distance running, as well as research presented last month showing fewer deaths among runners who log 20 miles per week at a leisure pace compared to lose who run longer and faster. Allday writes:

[The most recent study] and others all build evidence for the U-shaped curve of exercise benefits: that greater effort begets greater benefits, but only to a certain point. Then the benefits drop off, suggesting that there's probably a maximum amount of exercise before it starts to become unhealthy.

In another way to look at the U-curve, someone running 10 miles a week may actually be healthier than someone running 60 miles a week - and an athlete doing the 5K fun-run associated with the San Francisco Marathon may be better off, health-wise, than... the handful of other runners attempting the 52.4-mile double marathon.

While the U-curve is pretty widely accepted, there's disagreement over how much exercise may be too much. Many scientists say, assuming there exists a maximum safe amount of running, it's probably so high that very few runners will ever get there.

Previously: Untrained marathoners may risk temporary heart damage
Photo by Jon Roig

Popular posts