Driven by his Native Hawaiian ancestry, Kekoa Taparra, MD, PhD, a Stanford Medicine resident in radiation oncology, has focused his research on the health disparities experienced by Pacific Islanders, which includes Native Hawaiians, in terms of health outcomes and underrepresentation in the medical field.
Taparra and Curtiland DeVille, MD, a colleague from Johns Hopkins, recently published a paper in JAMA Network Open that takes a closer look at the underrepresentation of Pacific Islanders in health care. Previous studies showed that nearly 25% of the Hawaiian population identifies as Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, however less than 4% of physicians come from this group. Using national medical school, residency and academic faculty data collected from 2000 to 2020, Taparra and DeVille found that representation of Pacific Islanders in medicine was still abysmally low.
"There's this vast disparity in terms of representation," said Taparra. "We are among the rarest racial groups in medicine, and few recognize this is a problem given the disproportionate health disparities faced by our communities."
I spoke with Taparra about his background as a Native Hawaiian, the low rates of Pacific Islander people in medicine in the United States, and what can be done to address the gap. The following conversation has been edited for clarity and length.
What motivated you to take a closer look at these disparities?
For Pacific Islanders, including in Native Hawaiians, there are higher rates of cancer than other major ethnic and racial groups. A lot of my memories of growing up are of many family members suffering through cancer. At the end of my PhD, when I applied to medical school, I wrote about high cancer rate disparities among Pacific Islanders in my residency application.
Dr. DeVille was one of the people who interviewed me and he encouraged me to pursue this line of inquiry. I've been lucky to be involved with a lot of research focusing on those disparities, in terms of health outcomes and in representation in medicine.
What was your focus and what did you find?
In our research, we focused on Pacific Islander representation among medical students, residents and academic faculty physicians because the majority of previous studies have inappropriately lumped Pacific Islanders into the category of being Asian. So most publications prior to ours have shown a much higher representation of Pacific Islanders. I thought it was important to say, "Hey, actually, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islanders are one of the five distinct, federally recognized racial groups, and they actually have very poor representation in medicine."
When we analyzed representation through this disaggregated lens, we saw that Pacific Islanders were hugely underrepresented. In addition, when we disaggregate the monolithic Asian and Pacific Islander group, we unmask disparities throughout the medicine pipeline. This has huge implications because racially and ethnically concordant physicians can improve patient health outcomes by building strong doctor-physician relationships in marginalized communities that may otherwise have distrust for the medical system.
Why does that happen, and why is it a problem?
We cannot fix what we cannot see. Throughout my medical training, when taking care of patients, I can recognize other Pacific Islanders based on my conversations. But their medical records often erase that identity by categorizing them as Asian. That not only disrespects their personal identity but it also masks possible health disparities.
For instance, we recently published a paper showing that Native Hawaiians in Hawaii had the highest rates of developing a second breast cancer after treatment for a particular type of cancer, compared to other racial groups. This has important implications for certain treatments in the clinic.
More generally, most people don't know who Pacific Islanders are. The Pacific Islands are not in Asia. Additionally, there are 20 to 30 Pacific Islander countries -- about the same number as Asian countries, and clear distinctions between the two groups. Yet, Pacific Islanders often seem like more of an afterthought, like, "Hey, we have this random group of people, why don't we just throw them in with 'Asian' because they look more Asian than they do other groups?"
But, during the Clinton administration in the '90s, legislation was passed on ethnic disaggregation in the census that resulted in the Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander race being legally recognized in its own a separate category. Few academics acknowledge this and it's taken this long to recognize that there's even been a problem.
How do you think about solutions to these disparities? What can be done?
That's a million-dollar question, literally, because it requires money to build programs that enhance representation. One program in particular, ʻImi Hoʻōla (Hawaiian for "those who seek to heal") at the University of Hawaii, was founded to promote a pipeline of Pacific Islander pre-med students from the University of Hawaii.
The program helps with medical school admission test prep and learning the jargon of medical school because many of us have zero exposure to medicine prior to applying to medical school. The program also provides guidance on successfully navigating medical school.
It's critical to invest in programs like ʻImi Hoʻōla and make sure the funding continues. Providing more opportunities for Pacific Islanders to succeed in medical school and support them in their careers in medicine will be the best way to help combat some of the disparities their community faces.
Another big thing is simply including Pacific Islanders in programs for pre-med or medical students, or scholarship or programs. Advertisements and communications for such programs mention Black, Latino, Alaskan Native and Native American people, but not Pacific Islanders. That transparency of including them in these opportunities really makes a difference.
Photo by 1jaimages